Archive for the ‘science’ Category

An Inconvenient Truth Debunked

Tuesday, November 28th, 2006

Al Gore’s film is obviously propoganda. But don’t take my word for it. (more…)

Popularity: 7% [?]

Synthetic meat

Friday, June 23rd, 2006

From the world of weird science:

By 2009, scientists hope to use stem cells to grow the world’s first artificial meat.  That’s right people.  Test tube meat.  The  impact this technology will have on the poor, homeless, cattle ranchers of America, and animal right’s activists remains to be seen.  I’m certain the EU will respond in a similar and illegal manner, as they did with US genetically modified crops.

Popularity: 6% [?]

Ionizing for 800, Alex

Wednesday, December 21st, 2005

After a night out, I have been known to put my smoke-filled clothes directly in front of my air-ionizer (purchased from Orek). When I wake up in the morning, they are completely clean and free of any odor. And now, it looks like someone has taken this discovery and is about to commercialize it.

Popularity: 5% [?]

Of Asses and Rank

Wednesday, February 2nd, 2005

Scientific American reported a study indicating that monkeys value information based on its social context. *coughing*porn*coughing*

Monkeys Pay for Prurient Pictures

For a monkey, not all images are created equal. A new report indicates that the animals value some pictures more than others and are willing to pay for the privilege of viewing the important ones. The results indicate that monkeys, like people, value information based on its social context.

Robert Deaner of Duke University Medical Center and his colleagues studied male rhesus macaques that received juice rewards while looking at a variety of images of other macaques on a computer screen. The pictures included a neutral target, male monkeys that differed in social standing and the hindquarters of a female monkey, which reveal her sexual receptiveness. By systematically varying the amount of juice offered to the monkeys while changing the pictures they were seeing, the scientists determined how much the animals were willing to give up, or pay, in order to glimpse specific images. The team discovered that monkeys would give up a significant reward if it meant viewing high-ranking individuals or female behinds. But when given the chance to glance at images of low-ranking males, the subjects held out for additional juice.

The findings may help scientists understand the neural wiring that underlies social cognition. “At the moment, it’s only a tantalizing possibility, but we believe that similar processes are at work in these monkeys and in people,” says study co-author Michael Platt, also at Duke. “After all, the same kinds of social conditions have been important in primate evolution for both nonhuman primates and humans. So, in further experiments, we also want to try to establish in the same way how people attribute value to acquiring visual information about other individuals.” The findings will appear in the March issue of Current Biology.—Sarah Graham

Popularity: 7% [?]